As we continue in
our hunt for Osama bin Laden and his Al-Queda terrorist
squads, others are in the media are continuing their search for anything that
will get them attention and prove their undying love for this country. Case
in point Michelle Malkin of the New York Post. In the December
28th edition she decided to drink a tall glass of hator-aid
and direct her venom toward The Coup and Washington Post writer
David Segal who dared pick their album ‘Party Music’ as
his favorite for the year.
Ms Malkin attempts
to fan the flames by titling her column ‘Giving America A Bad Rap’
She then reports to her listeners that The Coup had a cover depicting the
World Trade being blown to bits… They even went and dredged up the picture.
The problem here is that The Coup had already done the album cover several
months prior to the September 11th Attacks. Plus they aren’t the
first artists to ‘blow up the World Trade in both rhymes and pictures. The
WTC had always symbolized everything from Capitalism to NY. When folks wish
to show opposition they blow it up.
Lead rapper Boots who has long stated his problem with the
oppressive nature of capitalism attempts to show it’s destruction by blowing
up the WTC. At the time the picture was taken, no one including him would’ve
imagined the horrors on September 11th.
Ms Malkin goes on
to describe that Boots protested the album cover being pulled after the
September 11th attacks. Now if you recall, when we interviewed
Boots he stated that he understood why the album cover was being pulled, but
he never went around and caused a big fuss and stink about it. He did say
that he didn’t want the album cover being pulled to somehow mean that he was
no longer against capitalism. He also spoke about the sincerity of those who
would pull the album cover. He questioned whether or not they were concerned
about protecting their bottom line or whether or not they had concern about
victims of a horrific tragedy.
He spoke about the
tendency for big corporations to do business as usual and never pull back
when death and destruction occur all around the world, but now that it’s on
our shores they suddenly want to empathize and show compassion. A death in
Africa is just as painful as a death in America. It’s the loss of human life.
He cited how some of these major record companies refused to pull out of
South Africa when thousands were being killed and brutalized by an
anti-black- Apartheid Regime. Many of the major record companies had no
problem doing business despite the please of those suffering. Many continue
to serve up degrading lyrics about rape and senseless gang killings despite
the pleas from community leaders right here at home. The record companies
hide behind the banner of freedom of speech. So why not now?
Such questions put
into context the Coup’s ’protest’. That’s a big difference between somehow
implying that Boots was insensitive and unconcerned about those who died. If
memory serves me correctly Boots lost people during that attack. He simply
talked about folks being consistent on their position.
This New York Post
writer tries to rally people by quoting lyrics to The Coups first single 5
Million Ways to Kill A CEO. She acts horrified and can’t believe that
a writer like David Segal would support such murderous lyrics. Ms Malkin
conveniently overlooks the fact that Boots uses metaphors. In this case the
fictional CEO in the song represents the oppressive boss who over burdens and
exploits poor workers. In their mind that CEO who represents the worse things
about capitalism, needs to be killed. The song is in the same vein of other
Coup songs, most notably the popular song ‘Fat Cat Bigger Fish’.
If Boots went out and advocated killing a particular CEO, she might be onto
something. But here she’s reaching. That song is no different then Eric
Clapton’s song “I Shot The Sheriff’, except its more
graphic. Is that song no longer a classic because of the policemen killed on
September 11th? Do video
outlets stop renting movies like Towering Inferno because
fireman died in those buildings?
Ms Malkin also
gets upset at the fact that Boots describes a scene in the song ‘Shit
On Your Grave’ where he stops to pee on the grave of George
Washington while visiting the Arlington National Cemetery. She
implies this is un-American and hence un-acceptable. Last I recall our
esteemed first President was a slave owner who made no attempts to free the
human beings who were owned by him. More then a 100 million died in during
the slave trade. Boots should’ve done more then pee on the grave. As far as
some people are concerned visiting the grave of a slave owner is like
visiting the grave of a Nazi Concentration Camp guard. I don’t get her beef.
One can’t pee on a slave owners grave?
All in all Ms
Malkin seems to be part of this new ilk of self-selecting Patriots. She wants
to lead a crusade against the Coup and this Washington Post writer who
enjoyed their album Party Music while in the same breath say we have freedom
of expression. ‘Death to the Coup and
Death to the Coup supporters!’, she seems to say. I wonder will she come
after those who support the Sopranos or those who love
Godfather Movies? After all they exude violence every week against American
citizens.
In this country we
are allowed to dissent and disagree and we have the freedom to like or not
like. The Coup hasn’t done a song-praising bin Laden nor have they gone
overseas to train terrorist or be apart of terrorist training camps. What’s
this bad rap? She’s talking about. The beauty of America is that you can have
zealot like Oliver North on one side of the room and Boots on the other and
this country will still stand and survive. So why waste time attacking folks
for expressing their opinions? Maybe it was a slow day and she like others
who have nothing or worth to say needed the controversy of Hip Hop and its
lyrics to put her name on the map. God Bless America.